References
Ahnert, Ruth, and Sebastian E. Ahnert. 2015. “Protestant
Letter Networks in the Reign of
Mary I: A
Quantitative Approach.” ELH 82
(1): 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2015.0000.
———. 2019. “Metadata, Surveillance and the
Tudor State.” History Workshop
Journal 87 (April): 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dby033.
Ahnert, Ruth, Sebastian E. Ahnert, Catherine Nicole Coleman, and Scott
B. Weingart. 2020. The Network Turn:
Changing Perspectives in the
Humanities. Cambridge UP. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/network-turn/CC38F2EA9F51A6D1AFCB7E005218BBE5.
Algee-Hewitt, Mark. 2017. “Distributed Character:
Quantitative Models of the
English Stage, 1550–1900.” New
Literary History 48 (4): 751–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2017.0038.
Basu, Anupam. 2025. Shakespeare and Scale:
The Archive of Early
Printed English. Cambridge
Elements: Shakespeare and Text.
Cambridge UP. https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/shakespeare-and-scale/B3EB39E9F6049B8A203150FCB2DE4E5E.
Basu, Anupam, and Joseph Loewenstein. 2019. “Spenser’s
Spell: Archaism and Historical
Stylometrics.” Spenser Studies 33
(January): 63–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/700300.
Bender, Emily M., Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret
Shmitchell. 2021. “On the Dangers of
Stochastic Parrots: Can
Language Models Be
Too Big?” In Proceedings of the
2021 ACM Conference on Fairness,
Accountability, and Transparency, 610–23.
FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing
Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922.
Berman, Merrick Lex, Ruth Mostern, and Humphrey Southall, eds. 2016.
Placing Names: Enriching and
Integrating Gazetteers. Indiana
University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2005zq7.
Bode, Katherine. 2017. “The Equivalence of
‘Close’ And
‘Distant’ Reading;
Or, Toward a New Object for
Data-Rich Literary
History.” Modern Language Quarterly 78 (1):
77–106. https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-3699787.
Bolla, Peter de, Ewan Jones, Paul Nulty, Gabriel Recchia, and John
Regan. 2020. “The Idea of Liberty,
1600–1800: A Distributional
Concept Analysis.” Journal of the
History of Ideas 81 (3): 381–406. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/761035.
Bourke, Evan. 2017. “Female Involvement,
Membership, and Centrality: A
Social Network Analysis of the
Hartlib Circle.” Literature
Compass 14 (4): n/a–. https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12388.
Burrows, John, and Hugh Craig. 2001. “Lucy Hutchinson
and the Authorship of Two
Seventeenth-Century Poems:
A Computational Approach.”
Seventeenth Century 16 (2): 259. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2001.10555493.
Craig, Hugh. 2011. “Shakespeare’s Vocabulary:
Myth and Reality.” Shakespeare
Quarterly 62 (1): 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2011.0002.
D’Souza, Lyra, and David Mimno. 2023. “The Chatbot
and the Canon: Poetry
Memorization in LLMs.” In. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Chatbot-and-the-Canon%3A-Poetry-Memorization-in-D'Souza-Mimno/c4e6167d156c8d20e7f3579ad1edd9bac8b5bbca.
Drucker, Johanna. 2011. “Humanities Approaches to
Graphical Display.” Digital
Humanities Quarterly 005 (1).
Eve, Martin Paul. 2019. Close Reading with
Computers: Textual Scholarship,
Computational Formalism, and
David Mitchell’s Cloud
Atlas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Furner, Jonathan. 2016. “‘Data’:
The Data.” In Information Cultures
in the Digital Age: A
Festschrift in Honor of Rafael
Capurro, edited by Matthew Kelly and Jared Bielby,
287–306. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_17.
Gadd, Ian. 2009. “The Use and Misuse of
Early English Books
Online.” Literature Compass 6 (3): 680–92.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2009.00632.x.
Gavin, Michael. 2016. “Historical Text
Networks: The Sociology of
Early English Criticism.”
Eighteenth-Century Studies 50 (1): 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2016.0041.
———. 2022. Literary Mathematics:
Quantitative Theory for Textual
Studies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Goyal, Kartik, Chris Dyer, Christopher Warren, Max G’Sell, and Taylor
Berg-Kirkpatrick. 2020. “A Probabilistic
Generative Model for
Typographical Analysis of Early
Modern Printing.” arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.01646.
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of
Weak Ties.” American Journal of
Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469.
Greteman, Blaine. 2015. “Milton and the Early
Modern Social Network:
The Case of the Epitaphium
Damonis.” Milton Quarterly 49 (2): 79–95.
https://doi.org/10.1111/milt.12126.
Heffernan, Laura, and Rachel Sagner Buurma. 2018. “Search and
Replace: Josephine Miles and the
Origins of Distant
Reading.” Modernism/Modernity Print Plus,
April. https://modernismmodernity.org/forums/posts/search-and-replace.
Henderson, Keith, Brian Gallagher, Tina Eliassi-Rad, Hanghang Tong,
Sugato Basu, Leman Akoglu, Danai Koutra, Christos Faloutsos, and Lei Li.
2012. “RolX: Structural Role Extraction &Amp;
Mining in Large Graphs.” In Proceedings of the 18th
ACM SIGKDD International Conference on
Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1231–39.
KDD ’12. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing
Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2339530.2339723.
Holmes, Martin. 2017. “Whatever Happened to Interchange?”
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32 (suppl_1): i63–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw048.
Hope, Jonathan, and Michael Witmore. 2010. “The
Hundredth Psalm to the Tune of
’Green Sleeves’: Digital
Approaches to Shakespeare’s
Language of Genre.” Shakespeare
Quarterly 61 (3): 357–90.
Jenstad, Janelle. 2011. “Using Early Modern Maps in Literary
Studies: Views and Caveats from
London.” In GeoHumanities.
Routledge.
Kelley, Shannon. 2017. “Getting on the Map:
A Case Study in
Digital Pedagogy and
Undergraduate Crowdsourcing.”
Digital Humanities Quarterly 11 (3). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/11/3/000330/000330.html.
Kichuk, Diana. 2007. “Metamorphosis: Remediation in
Early English Books
Online (EEBO).” Literary and
Linguistic Computing 22 (3): 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm018.
Kulick, Seth, and Neville Ryant. 2020. “Parsing Early
Modern English for Linguistic
Search.” arXiv:2002.10546 [Cs], February.
http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.10546.
Ladd, John. 2022. “Reassembling the Bacon:
Crowdsourcing Historical Social
Networks in the Redesign of Six
Degrees of Francis Bacon.”
In Social Knowledge Creation in the
Humanities: Volume 2, edited by Aaron
Mauro, 169–94. New Technologies in Medieval
and Renaissance Studies 8. Iter Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/S/bo99702245.html.
Ladd, John, Jessica Otis, Christopher N. Warren, and Scott Weingart.
2017. “Exploring and Analyzing Network
Data with Python.” Programming
Historian, August. https://programminghistorian.org/en/lessons/exploring-and-analyzing-network-data-with-python.
Langmead, Alison, Jessica M. Otis, Christopher Warren, Scott B.
Weingart, and Lisa D. Zilinkski. 2016. “Towards
Interoperable Network Ontologies
for the Digital Humanities.”
International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing,Intl J
Humanities & Arts Computing 10 (1): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2016.0157.
Lavin, Matthew. 2021. “Why Digital
Humanists Should Emphasize
Situated Data over Capta.”
Digital Humanities Quarterly 015 (2).
Martin, Shawn. 2007. “EEBO, Microfilm,
and Umberto Eco: Historical
Lessons and Future Directions for
Building Electronic
Collections” 36 (4): 159–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/MFIR.2007.159.
McLean, Austin J. 2001. “Early British
Printing Meets the Electronic
Age: A Large-Scale
Digitization Case Study”
30 (4): 127–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/MFIR.2001.127.
Misek, Linda Douglas. n.d. “COMPUTING A
CONTEXT: STYLE, STRUCTURE,
AND THE SELF-IMAGE
OF SATAN IN
’PARADISE LOST.’ (VOLUMES
I AND II) -
ProQuest.” PhD thesis. Accessed June 23, 2023. https://www.proquest.com/openview/9a2ce163529a5cae4b7385715a96751b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.
Mitchell, Melanie. 2024. “The Metaphors of Artificial
Intelligence.” Science 386 (6723): eadt6140. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adt6140.
Mueller, Martin. 2008. “Digital Shakespeare, or
Towards a Literary
Informatics.” Shakespeare 4 (3): 284–301.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17450910802295179.
Quiring, Ana. 2024. “Fingerprints of British
Book History: A
Feminist Labor History of
EEBO.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 18 (1).
https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/18/1/000718/000718.html.
Raamsdonk, Esther van, and Ruth Ahnert. 2022. “John
Milton’s Network and the Republic
of Letters Renaissance and
Reformation.” Renaissance and Reformation
44 (3).
Siefring, Judith, and Eric T. Meyer. 2013. “Sustaining the
EEBO-TCP Corpus in
Transition: Report on the TIDSR
Benchmarking Study.” {SSRN} {Scholarly}
{Paper}. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2236202.
Smith, Astrid J., and Bridget Whearty. 2023. “All the
Work You Do Not
See: Labor, Digitizers, and the
Foundations of Digital
Humanities.” In Debates in the
Digital Humanities 2023. Debates in the
Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: Univ Of
Minnesota Press. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/debates-in-the-digital-humanities-2023/section/f1946d2b-93ca-4ea0-ab8c-54fb835750ad#ch02.
Trettien, Whitney. 2022. Cut/Copy/Paste:
Fragments from the History of
Bookwork. U of Minnesota P. https://www.upress.umn.edu/9781517904098/cutcopypaste/.
Vogler, Nikolai, Kartik Goyal, Samuel V. Lemley, D. J. Schuldt,
Christopher N. Warren, Max G’Sell, and Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick. 2024.
“Clustering Running Titles
to Understand the Printing
of Early Modern Books.” In
Document Analysis and Recognition -
ICDAR 2024, edited by Elisa H. Barney Smith, Marcus
Liwicki, and Liangrui Peng, 374–90. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70543-4_22.
Warren, Christopher N, Samuel V Lemley, D J Schuldt, Elizabeth
Dieterich, Laura S DeLuca, Max G’Sell, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Kari
Thomas, Kartik Goyal, and Nikolai Vogler. 2023. “Who
Rpinted Shakespeare’s Fourth
Folio?” Shakespeare Quarterly 74 (2):
139–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/sq/quad021.
Warren, Christopher N., Daniel Shore, Jessica Otis, Lawrence Wang, Mike
Finegold, and Cosma Shalizi. 2016. “Six Degrees of
Francis Bacon: A
Statistical Method for
Reconstructing Large Historical
Social Networks.” Digital
Humanities Quarterly 10 (3). http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/3/000244/000244.html.
Warren, Christopher N., Pierce Wiliams, Shruti Rijhwani, and Max G’Sell.
2020. “Damaged Type and Areopagitica’s
Clandestine Printers.” Milton
Studies 62 (1): 1–47. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/2/article/748968.
Watts, Duncan J., and Steven H. Strogatz. 1998. “Collective
Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks.” Nature
393 (6684): 440–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918.
Wernimont, Jacqueline. 2019. Numbered Lives:
Life and Death in Quantum
Media. Edited by Elizabeth Losh and Celia Pearce.
Media Origins. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Witmore, Michael, Jonathan Hope, and Michael Gleicher. 2016.
“Digital Approaches to the Language of
Shakespearean Tragedy.” In The
Oxford Handbook of Shakespearean
Tragedy, edited by Michael Neill and David Schalkwyk.
https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198724193.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198724193-e-20.
Yang, Yi, and Jacob Eisenstein. 2016. “Part-of-Speech
Tagging for Historical
English.” arXiv:1603.03144 [Cs], April. http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.03144.